Friday, July 23, 2010

nma iPhone App developers - umee - fall on first hurdle

Far be it for me to spank an App development company for their App, but the irony of this is just too sweet not to highlight.

I downloaded the nma (new media age) App (v1.1) onto my iPhone4 running iOS4.0.1.

The App shouts load & proud that it’s “another great app by umee – the app specialists” on the load/splash screen, then promotes the add developers again with a banner add at the bottom of the home page “umee – Crafting brilliant apps for iPhone + Android”.

Wanting to learn of these “brilliant apps” I click on the banner ad and the App attempts to launch a modal view, presumably of these other “brilliant apps” only to bomb – crash.

The App isn’t iOS4 friendly (it doesn’t multitask, which should be easily solved by compiling for iOS4) which may be the issue.

To shout so loud and fall on the first hurdle doesn’t instil any sense of brilliance in crafting - it's just ironic :)

Details of the App from nma web site:
http://www.nma.co.uk/resources/iphone-app/

The App can be downloaded via iTunes:
http://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/new-media-age/id340427952?mt=8

Friday, January 8, 2010

Times: 2010 will see a blizzard of television innovations

Times, January 8, 2010, 2010 will see a blizzard of television innovations
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/gadgets_and_gaming/article6981466.ece

There is nothing new about 3D (invented by Sir Charles Wheatstone in 1840) – likewise there is nothing new about Augmented Reality (Head Up Displays, aka HUDs were created by the Royal Navy five decades ago), so there is a compelling argument that questions why now would either of these concepts become commonplace in 2010?

For 3D to take-off (this year), the market for consumption of media in 3D format has to be there – I personally don’t see this – I don’t see the consumer appetite for it anymore than I see the appetite for HD! How many homes have currently watch HD TV or even HD video (Blu-ray)?

Add into this mix, the need to upgrade your TV to a 3D TV and I just can’t see the mass adoption required to make this the year of 3D. Early adopters aside (which I count myself as one, owning an HD ready and TrueHD TV as well as Freesat, Cable and Freeview, a Blu-ray player and a 1080p Digital SLR), 3D simply won’t make a huge impact on the populous outside of the domain it is best suited to – cinema :)

AR (Augmented Reality) on the other hand is a reality (pun intended) that is here to stay and only get richer, thanks mainly to smartphones, and the king of those, the iPhone.

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Why does snow cripple Great Britain? - Or does it?

A colleague, who made it into the office, albeit from London today, remarked, somewhat sarcastically, that
"as soon as the cataclysmic -2 degrees that paralyzed Great Britain subsides"
in response to needing to have a meeting in person.

As you might have guessed I didn’t make it into the office today – not because I couldn’t - I could have cycled on my mountain bike (Specialized M4) all the way there (have done this in the past - it's only 19 miles), but it was/is the getting back that causes the most anguish. Instead I stayed in the warmth and comfort of my home and worked remotely (see other post on using Microsoft Office, Sharepoint and Exchange).

It’s not just Britain that is being affected by “snow” and “cold” temperatures. Various parts of the world are too, and yet as my colleague, who lived most of his life in Poland and Germany, also quipped
"Well. London is -3.3 though. Not exactly ‘Diesel freezing in the tank’"
– and he’s right.

My sister lives in B.C. Canada and she regularly experiences sub -30 degrees Centigrade during the winter, and her Diesel doesn’t freeze either. Apparently, Alaskans are running vehicles regularly at minus 51 degrees. Actually it’s pretty impossible to freeze Diesel naturally (in the outdoors), it normally requires laboratory conditions – I might get one of the people at work (Imperial College London) to try it.

So, why does snow cripple Britain?
(My colleague chose his words carefully to prefix Britain with "Great" so as to run salt [pun intended] into the wound of Britain not so great when it falls foul to some snow and -3 degrees C.)

The answer lies in the fact that we experience vastly different and rapidly changing weather throughout the year, making planning for specific events or extremes of weather conditions difficult and most important not cost effective.

Local councils could easily buy more grit, invest in snow ploughs, and other snow defeating/clearing equipment, but the cost to reward ratio is probably disproportionate, such that it doesn’t make efficient use of the budget that a council has to mitigate risk of event that will materially affect transport.

It’s basic risk assessment. How often does it snow in specific areas of Britain? Take Watford for example. Not that often. Then ask, of those times that it does snow, how much affect will it have on roads (taking into account such things as, how heavy, frequency, length of downfall, etc.) and you probably get an answer of very little. Enough to dedicate £250,000 of budget to it? Less? More?

Who knows, as predicting the same as last year or even a trend over decades will be difficult, because we experience such variance in our weather.

You see, other countries, where they know they are going to get snow and they know it’s going to be freezing for the whole season, can predict this and gear up for it and deal with it accordingly. Take Latvia, I was over there around this time last year doing some consultancy work (bizarrely with my CEO of my current company – see other post), and the guys we were working with told us that on a specific date each year (1st December until 1st March) it becomes illegal to drive without snow tyres!

Other countries can predict their weather so well that they can legislate for it! In fact the following countries have specific requirements (for tyres) during winter:

•France
•Switzerland
•Austria
•Italy
•Finland
•Latvia
•Norway
•Sweden
•Slovenia
•Germany

So, whilst another Twitter mentioned to me that we should learn from our European cousins, the problem is they have generally more predictability in their weather, or at least the colder regions therein have.

As an island, stuck where we are, getting hit by up to seven different weather systems, we tend to have more weather variance; that’s weather variance rather than climate variance; I make the distinction as the same Twitter also mentioned “if the weather pattern is changing we need to adapt”, which is true (we should adapt), but not just to the weather, but to the change in climate.

The irony is that climate change will likely mean more variance in weather rather than more predictability (colder or warmer), so it may become more difficult to keep Britain’s transport systems operational, as it may be heavy snow one week and floods the next, followed by mild and calm the next.

So how do we avoid becoming parallelised by snow (or indeed the weather, full stop)?

Well, one suggestion already mentioned is to bike it – decent mud tyres on your MTB will cut through the snow and slush and get you safely, legally and quickly to work. You also have more flexibility on route – cross country is not out of the question!

Another is walking, although less practical for long distances.

Another is a four wheel drive vehicle (not the silly ones, like the X6), which frankly is unnecessary to own except in these circumstances or if you live/work on a farm/dirt-track, but they do have their uses and this is one of them. My good friend Matt has a Land Rover and he rarely gets stuck. I actually recommend one of these:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_F7QrR4Ur8

Silliness aside, does snow really cripple Great Britain?

I don’t think so, it merely hampers things for a while. Remote working (read: staying at home) is probably the solution and that doesn’t really affect work if done appropriately, with the obviously exception on critical services, teachers, nurses, nuclear power station operators, etc.

Monday, December 14, 2009

Times: Detica dismisses internet spying concerns

Times: December 14, 2009, Detica dismisses internet spying concerns
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6956587.ece

DPI is a necessary networking requirement for any network operator; however, it cannot keep pace with the speeds of the Telco networks and provide the desired inspection and subsequent restriction of “bad” packets, whatever you define “bad” as.

Avoidance techniques are very easy.

Frankly I don’t see the need to file share, illegal or otherwise – I have my own CD collection ripped in a lossless format for distribution around my house across a gigabit network and wirelessly – why do I need to acquire other people’s music or movies – I don’t!

And finally,
“Mr Klein said that Detica’s experience in tracking online child pornography”

– the term “child pornography” is inappropriate – it should be “child abuse images”, which accurately classifies the image as abuse, rather than the connotation associated with “pornography”, which is psychologically less abhorrent.

Monday, January 5, 2009

What is your web site? Uc, U, PG, 12A, 12, 15, 18 or R18?

The [government’s] idea of certification for the web is broadly impractical and unenforceable, but the intent is well meant, however it should not be taken in isolation. This kind of rating idea has been touted before and I discussed it with surfers whilst I was on the user focus group and steering committee at Ask Jeeves back in 2000. 

I agree that encouraging wiser parental control should be at the core of any proposition to help curb the influence of the nastier side of life that the Internet offers a window into. 

One way would to offer “monitoring” rather than blocking, as monitoring has been shown to encourage responsible usage and foster a greater trust and understanding, rather than prohibition, which alienates and in some ways divorces the guardian (parent, teacher, elder sibling, etc.) from their duty of care (read: “oh the computer will stop anything really nasty”). I experienced this when architecting such solutions (at Chronicle Solutions) for corporate organisations. 

I would rather see guardian’s draw-up AUPs with those they are responsible for and then monitor their usage against that, discuss and revise, than see the government impose an arbitrary rating system that gives artificial comfort of control. 

Thursday, June 19, 2008

BBC play Cold - in High Definition

You have probably been abroad or been working in a bunker if you haven’t heard about Coldplay on the BBC – If it isn’t “Radio 1 Presents... Coldplay live from the Brixton Academy in London” then it’s an “exclusive free gig at BBC TV Centre for 600 people” – broadcast live last night (Wednesday 18 June 2008) simultaneously on BBC2 and BBCHD for around 45 minutes.

The setting of the latter was always going to be (stage managed to be?) unusual/unique – I cannot recall any other bands performing in front of the BBC Television Centre in White City – and that’s part of the charm, and indeed brand, of Coldplay – however that was most likely the main problem when it came to kicking off the event, as the sound engineering, specifically the mixing, wasn’t up to scratch and belied the point of broadcasting in HD. Not that live mixing is easy – as my brother keeps telling me – but one would have thought the BBC, if anyone should, would be able to get it right. The other problem appeared to be that the band looked shattered.

After a few songs Chris’ voice warmed up, which combined with a couple of carefully disguised gestures to the sound desk meant the sound engineer(s) got the levels sorted out and although Jonny Buckland (lead guitarist) looked distinctively bored throughout, the band excelled in usual fashion – becoming a habit – and the crowd select revelled in their wonder. Even Alan Yentob (Creative Director for the BBC) managed to put in a smiling appearance, although neither Ricky Gervais nor Jay-Z could let their carefully controlled demeanour show much more than the odd head nod, which is a pity because on the whole it was an engaging gig.

Chris was as interactive and amenable to his audience as ever, and one simply warms to him, especially when he expels little crowd pleasers such as “A helicopter’s filming my friends with me... I turned and said... Don’t film the bald spot on top of my head” in place of the usual lyrics to Trouble from their Parachutes album as the director changes camera to show a helicopter filming the event from on high. Chris later comments on his own body gesticulations as “I can’t dance, but I’m enthusiastic”.

And enthusiasm exudes from the whole band (with the notable exception is Buckland), deep passion about playing their music, such that it is easy to become envious of that passion. In all honesty, the band, specifically Chris isn’t a great looker (which he freely admits, "as you can see, we are more of a band with faces for radio") nor the world’s best voice, and he self proclaims he cannot dance, but who cares when a front man can deliver such great lyrics and music to accompany them with such energy?

I wasn’t sure whether to take Chris’ comments about how Coldplay fly around in helicopters all the time now (“that’s how it is these days for Coldplay; it’s helicopters and crazy stuff like that”) as that’s just the way it is for a hugely successful band or whether it was the first sign a smugness that might have descended upon the nice people of Coldplay – I think I prefer to believe the former, after all, it must be difficult be that politically-correct and generally decent (even apologising for a bum note) in a world that isn’t!

It was otherwise a well directed intimate affair and a memorable occasion that I will retain my Shy HD box (I cannot export it in HD format, only SD – shame on you Sky) and it wasn’t available on the (excellent) BBC’s iPlayer at the original time of post - but is now, here...

It just a shame the sound, whilst encoded in perfect digital stereo, falls short of what it should have been.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Amazon “Prime” time – father’s day irony!

Yesterday afternoon the postman delivered my belated father’s day present, ordered by my wife on behalf of my daughter, who being only 20 months old is too young to order stuff, even from Amazon.

The present, a book called “Dad Rules” (published by Fig Tree) is by Andrew Clover, the same person who regularly makes both my wife and I chuckle at his canny observations detailed in his column, of the same title, “Dad Rules”, on the last page of “style” magazine in the Sunday Times (and online).

Andrew's column had obviously prompted my wife to purchase the book for me – a little late thinking me thinks – but anyway my wife hops onto Amazon (.co.uk), finds the book and is about to order when I realise she could benefit from my Amazon Prime membership! So I nudge her out of the way, sign into my account, invite her (you are allowed up to four family members on your Prime membership) then let her get back to her important task - ordering my present!

After accepting my invitation to join my Prime membership, my wife then completes the order and ‘Bob’s your uncle’ the book gets delivered by Amazon the next day, postage free!

Amazon Prime costs £49, per annum, so if you use Amazon a lot (which I do –see Calling International Rescue – Amazon family saver), then it makes perfect sense as it will not just save you money, but also your family members.

I am however, not immune to the irony, that ultimately I paid the postage for my own present!